jump to navigation

Top Greenhouse Gas emitters… China, US, Indonesia and Brazil May 16, 2007

Posted by Tom in Environment, future, social problems.
trackback

A non tech story… (though its complete inability to be solved with technological solutions makes it interesting)
deforestation
I suppose the shocking news is that Indonesia and Brazil are top greenhouse emitters. They are, after all, not great industrial nations (Can you name a single product that is manufactured for international markets in either of these countries?) and I don’t really think of them as being large energy consumers like Europe or North America (or Australia for that matter).
More surprising is how much CO2 is produced from the deforestation process. I was sent a shocking article from today’s Independent (UK). In it, we learn that over the next twenty four hours more emissions will come from deforestation (slashing and burning) than from 8 million (yes, million) people flying from New York to London. That is (if my maths is correct) about 5555 people a minute.
I hate to push politics but this is pretty upsetting. It’s time for the world to put a price on leaving forests (particularly rain forests) untouched. It’s up to the UN at this week’s climate summit in Indonesia to find a solution. (Maybe legislation that enforces taxing use of the forests to subsidise non-use).
Quote from article:
“Standing forest was not included in the original Kyoto protocols and stands outside the carbon markets”

Advertisements

Comments»

1. China Law Blog - May 17, 2007

China seems to be making every effort to run away from the rest of the pack.

2. PD - June 11, 2007

from the WSJ

World Bank May Aid Rain-Forest Rescue
By TOM WRIGHT
June 11, 2007
JAKARTA, Indonesia — The global effort to stem climate change could soon include paying countries in the tropical belt to not cut down their rain forests, beginning with a World Bank pilot project.

The World Bank is planning to start a $250 million investment fund to reward countries such as Indonesia, Brazil and Congo for “avoided deforestation.”

Until now, efforts under the Kyoto Protocol, the international agreement to cut greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming, have centered on reducing emissions from industries.

The Group of Eight leading nations, after meeting last week in Germany, concluded that stopping deforestation could provide a “significant and cost-effective contribution toward mitigating greenhouse-gas emissions” and encouraged the development of the World Bank’s project.

• Pilot Project: The World Bank got G-8 support for a $250 million investment fund to reward countries for not cutting down their rain forests.

• Why Save Trees? Deforestation accounts for some 20% of global carbon emissions, mainly from fires set in forests to clear land.

• What to Expect: Companies and governments aren’t likely to put much money into the fund unless they sense that saving trees will qualify as a means of generating emission “credits” on the international carbon market.

Deforestation accounts for some 20% of global carbon emissions, mainly from fires set in forests to clear land. It is the major cause of greenhouse gases in some developing nations such as Indonesia. The World Bank says forested areas equivalent to the size of Portugal are being cleared each year.

Environmental organizations have long sought to stem logging because of its impact, but, until now, tackling the problem has largely been overlooked by governments seeking to reduce global warming.

The prospect of addressing global warming by preserving trees is alluring. Amid intensifying global-warming regulations, it could give developed countries — and companies based there — a cheap way to offset their obligation to curb their own energy-related emissions at home. On the flip side, it could provide a source of foreign investment for developing countries, which don’t face emission caps.

But whether the World Bank’s fund will draw much investment is unclear. Under the Kyoto Protocol, saving existing trees doesn’t qualify as a means of generating emission “credits” on the international carbon market.

Several years ago, many companies invested in projects to protect existing forests, thinking they would get cheap carbon credits for their efforts, but then saw their investments wasted when global regulators decided not to allow avoided deforestation as a source of emission credits.

Today, companies and governments aren’t likely to put much money into the fund unless they sense that prohibition is likely to be lifted.

Benoit Bosquet, a senior natural-resources management specialist at the World Bank who is leading efforts to develop the pilot project, said policy makers in developed nations have realized they can’t ignore the effect of deforestation on climate change. “It is the first time there’s such high-level recognition of the need to include [compensation] for avoided deforestation,” he said.

Many details of the project remain to be ironed out. The World Bank hopes Group of Eight nations will supply most of the $250 million, Mr. Bosquet said.

The bank will work with governments, local communities and nongovernmental organizations to set guidelines on how to monitor projects and make sure money will be channeled only to those that strictly protect forested areas. To qualify for money, governments also will have to sign up to nationwide-action plans combating issues such as illegal logging.

If the World Bank’s approach is to work and be adopted more widely as a weapon in fighting global warming, it will take involvement of private companies and the emerging carbon-trading system. Under Kyoto rules, companies that exceed caps on emissions of greenhouse gases can buy carbon credits directly from other firms that are short of their caps and use them to reduce their levels below legal limits. Or credits can be bought on a number of emerging exchanges. Companies also are allowed to invest in projects in poorer countries that reduce emissions, including reforestation projects, which create carbon credits.

The omission of avoided deforestation from the treaty was the result of concerns about the environmental effectiveness of the process — particularly since it would be difficult to enforce agreements by developing nations. Some environmentalists fear nations might sign up to secure one area, shifting deforestation elsewhere, but bringing no net gain.

Mr. Bosquet said the World Bank’s project is an attempt to overcome these concerns as nations debate whether to overhaul Kyoto, which runs out in 2012.

A number of recent studies have helped reduce concerns that focusing on deforestation will shift the debate away from finding more efficient ways to use energy. The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, commissioned by the British government, last year highlighted the urgent need to bring deforestation into efforts to fight global warming.

In March, a report by the World Bank and Britain’s Department for International Development found that Indonesia was the world’s third-largest emitter of greenhouse gases after the U.S. and China. That conclusion — Indonesia’s economy is relatively small — stems from rampant deforestation caused by forest fires that sometimes envelop much of Southeast Asia in haze, emitting huge amounts of carbon dioxide.

For their part, developing countries are becoming more strident in demanding compensation for protecting their primary forests. The Coalition for Rainforest Nations, a group led by Papua New Guinea and Costa Rica, tabled a proposal demanding payment for preserving forests at the United Nation’s annual meeting on climate change in Kenya in November.

It remains unclear whether private investors will be interested in participating in the World Bank’s project, given that Kyoto doesn’t yet sanction avoided deforestation. “I don’t think the big banks are going to invest without clarity they are going to get returns on the risk,” Mr. Bosquet said.

Without wider private-sector participation, countries could be tempted to turn land over to palm-oil or other high-value agricultural use, rather than to generate carbon credits that can be sold, he added.

–Jeffrey Ball contributed to this article.

Write to Tom Wright at tom.wright@dowjones.com

3. Tom - June 13, 2007

Thanks for the article. Very insightful. It’s a shame the measures fall so short. Whatever else can one do? I suppose we should smile at any headway in this matter.

4. Anonymous - March 14, 2008

i hate poepledeforestation

5. rishabh - July 5, 2008

superb site thank you for photos

6. Longineus - January 22, 2009

Some companhies like Nike, Sony, Sansung, Siemens, Nokia, Lg,Hp, Epson, Ford,Fiat, GMC, Renault, Audi, 3M, Avon and Coke currently have Industries in Brazil manufacturing for international markets.

Besides that, without some heavy investment, “put a price on leaving forests (particularly rain forests) untouched” would mean starving about 5.000 families directly involved in illegal deforestation, which is in turn responsible for supplying 60% of the vegetal coal to the metal industry in the country, which employ 63.000 people.

Tom - February 18, 2009

Besides that, without some heavy investment, “put a price on leaving forests (particularly rain forests) untouched” would mean starving about 5.000 families directly involved in illegal deforestation, which is in turn responsible for supplying 60% of the vegetal coal to the metal industry in the country, which employ 63.000 people.

So get on with the heavy investment. If the worst comes to the worst, there will be many more starving families and many more unemployed after years of climate change.

7. Copenhagen Conference Vital to Climate Future « Greener Fuel - April 14, 2009

[…] Since Kyoto in 1997, there have been many changes to the world climate change scenario. The USA has been replaced by China as the largest greenhouse gas emitter (Brazil and Inonesia aren’t far behind), and oil prices […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: